Path: paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "NightBulb.net" <nospam@nightbulb.net>
Newsgroups: alt.christnet.christianlife,alt.bible
Subject: Lust Busters: Mosaic of 1000 Toilets
Followup-To: alt.bible
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:54:08 -0600
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <tofmcf$13bhe$12@news.mixmin.net>
References: <to58tc$1rguc$1@dont-email.me>
 <63a72fc5$0$2251$1c4686b2@news.club.cc.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:00:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="d193e872d1e24a3037ee30f47146a21e52b80d1b";
	logging-data="1158702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <63a72fc5$0$2251$1c4686b2@news.club.cc.cmu.edu>
Xref: paganini.bofh.team alt.christnet.christianlife:1041547 alt.bible:654239

On 12/24/22 10:58, servant wrote:
> One poster pushed the idea that one kind of "lust" is just dandy; to
> "covet".  It was mentioned to the poster this was an artifact of the
> language of the kjv,ie. it used archaic words that have changed their
> usage/meaning over the centuries.
> 
> The poster wanted "covet gifts" in 1 Corin. kjv to mean its dandy to
> "lust/covet gifts".  That is to covet them as the new "theory of scripture"
> for the past 75 years means as awof/nar guru uses them as "gifts" of
> specticle to define their spiritual authority..  One might suspect the idea
> came from hearing some wof/nar gru expounding this nnonsense the poster
> "shared".
> 
> Alas, it just ain't so.
> 
> Here a page looking at 1 Corin. 12:31 where kjv had "covet gifts".  The
> dozen or so of other translations into modern english meaning there all
> have "desire" in the sense of "seek".  This includes the rsv and nkjv, both
> of which wanted to update archaic language in the kjv.
> 
> Sorry, just ain't not no "lust" exception there.

We can bust the lust into a mosaic of a thousand toilets.

We can break up sins into categories or whatever and compare and 
contrast them. It's kind of like gathering up treasures from a thousand 
toilets into a pool and examining them and commenting on the unique 
properties of each treasure.

We can examine the unique consistency of each treasure. We can quantify 
their moisture content. We can draw up a table of the specific 
properties, densities, microbial flora, etc.

Comparing sins is a similar endeavor. The horizontal sins float on the 
surface. The vertical sins sort of bob up and down with one end breaking 
the surface from time to time.

-- 

Nightbulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

If tacky red hats annoy Pharisees I want to buy hats for the whole town.

