Path: paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail From: "NightBulb.net" Newsgroups: alt.bible Subject: Re: Jesus = Michael the archangel? Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 23:13:47 -0500 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <20231018231347.6aaa5e1f.nospam@nightbulb.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="59160"; posting-host="UsdsZiYKRHXfHJF8iqyOmA.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; Cancel-Lock: sha256:XzCYR8tlPcvilakYkxfVjfm8X+O8nTy/U5DFkiaeYBE= X-TOR-Router: sha256:MmEwYjpmNGMwOjE2Yzo1Ojox -- X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Xref: paganini.bofh.team alt.bible:663360 On Sat, 07 Oct 2023 13:43:15 -0400 James wrote: > So was Jesus Michael the archangel? The evidence is there. Some may > say yes, and some no. It's your decision. As long as you can make the word of God flexible, you can make it mean anything you want it to mean. Your bible study consists of picking cherries and splitting raisins and figs. -- NightBulb | https://nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.